The Journal of the Association of Adventist Forums
Volume 25, No. 4 (June 1996)
SABBATH SLAUGHTER: SDAs AND RWANDA
by Alita Byrd
According to a September 4, 1995, African Rights, a respected human-rights organization based in London, accuses Ntakirutimana and his son, Dr. Gerard Ntakirutimana, of "active [participation] in the genocide," along with two other Adventists-Salomon Mpayamaguru, secretary-treasurer of the Gitwe Adventist Association, and Eziro Tabaro, a deacon. According to African Rights, Mpayamaguru is in detention in Gitarama, and Tabaro "is responsible for many deaths, including [those] of Adventist pastors."(1)
According to the Washington Times,(2) an investigator from the Hague came to
the United States in September to look into Ntakirutimana's case. Members of
the Rwandan community in the U.S. report that Ntakirutimana is now living with
his son in Laredo, Texas. He has not returned repeated phone calls or responded
to fax requests from the Times to discuss the reports. Church officials have
denied knowledge of his whereabouts.
According to a special Adventist World Report released in December 1994, at least 3,000 people died in the slaughter at Mugunaro, and close to 1,000 were
killed at the Adventist university in Gitwe. In addition to accusations that
certain Adventists aided the killers in both places, there is also evidence
that Adventists risked their lives to save others.
Adventists are not the only religious figures accused of participating in the
genocide. In a country estimated to be 90 percent Christian, many professed
Christians and their church leaders were involved in the killing. Priests,
nuns, and pastors of various faiths have been accused of crimes, including
providing names of Tutsis and Hutu moderates to be eliminated. Clergy even
betrayed the hiding places of people fleeing death.
Most of the published evidence against Ntakirutimana and leaders of other
denominations--including the reports in Newsweek and the Washington Times--draws
from research done by African Rights, whose work is being used by the
International Tribunal at the Hague. In 1995, Rakiya Omaar and Alex de Waal,
directors of African Rights, published a revised edition of Rwanda: Death,
Despair, and Defiance, a 1,200-page report on the 100 days' genocide that began
on April 6, 1994. The evidence, based on scores of interviews with refugees conducted during and after the genocide, varies in quality and must be examined
carefully. But although it may not yet be conclusive, it is deeply disturbing.
An international war crimes tribunal finds the evidence sufficiently credible
to name Ntakirutimana as a suspect of mass murders. "The tribunal is
investigating what happened in Kibuye, and Elsaphane Ntakirutimana is on the
list of persons presumed guilty," said Alain Sigg, spokesman for the
International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda. At the time of publication, this
tribunal, connected with the International War Crimes Tribunal at the Hague,
has indicted two individuals, held in Zambia, and eight others whose identities
have yet to be revealed. All eight, currently outside Rwanda, are implicated in
killings in the region of Kibuye. Consequently, the tribunal's strategy is to
present the evidence to the countries concerned in the hope of encouraging the
suspects' arrest.
Conflicts between the Hutus and Tutsis, the two main ethnic groups in Rwanda,
date back about 600 years. The most recent fighting took place in 1994 after the death, in a plane crash, of Habyarimana, the Hutu president. The country
erupted in an orgy of violence and murder. A Hutu militia, the interahamwe,
prepared lists of Tutsis and Hutu moderates to be eliminated, then went from
village to village and house to house murdering unsuspecting victims. The
mostly-Tutsi Rwandan Patriotic Front invaded Rwanda, and death counts rose even
higher. It is estimated that somewhere between 500,000 and 1 million people
lost their lives.
Until the 1994 killings, the church in Rwanda was one of the fastest growing in
the world. According to the General Conference Archives, in 1993, one in every
27 Rwandans was an Adventist, one of the highest concentrations in the world.
If the ratio of those killed (500,000 to 1 million) to the population of the
country were the same among the Adventist population, between 20,000 and 40,000
Adventist members were killed. A General Conference World Report says that, of
the nearly 300,000 Adventist Rwandans, more than 100,000 fled as refugees and
10,000 more were killed in the crisis.
Many Adventists were murdered in their homes, while others were killed in
churches where they fled for safety. One of the worst tragedies occurred in a
large Adventist community in Mugunaro, in the region of Kibuye. The Adventist
headquarters for the area boasted a large church, a nursing school, a hospital,
and a primary school. It was an "Adventist ghetto," said Elder L. T. Daniel,
president of the Africa-Indian Ocean Division, and many people went there for
protection. On April 16, 1994, the Mugunaro massacre began when the interahamwe
and their supporters attacked the thousands seeking refuge in the church and
surrounding buildings. A few escaped, but most died in the slaughter.
In Death, Despair, and Defiance, African Rights published the testimonies of
several survivors of the Kibuye massacre. All name Elsaphane Ntakirutimana as
responsible for the killing. The information contained in these testimonies
varies in detail and seriousness of accusation, and constitutes much of the
evidence against Ntakirutimana.
Elia Gashi, a 32-year-old man who lost 40 members of his immediate and extended
family during the killings, describes the tragedy: According to Gashi's account, he and many others rushed to the Adventist
hospital. The killers pursued them.
The attempt to save the women and children by placing them in the church was
equally disastrous, Gashi says.
Edison Kayihura, 34, a farmer from a district in Ngoma, lost his wife and three
children inside the Adventist church. He, too, mentions the letter to
Ntakirutimana, begging for protection.
When the killing started, they killed both in the church and in the hospital. I
was in the church. As the killing continued, I fell under dead bodies. I made
sure I was adequately covered by dead bodies and soaked with the blood of
others. When they thought that everyone was dead, they started the looting. The
fact that there are any survivors is due to the fact that a few of us were able
to sneak out in the night." Jerome Bayingana was in his fourth year of secondary school at the time of the
crisis. His testimony corroborates the others' eyewitness accounts of the
slaughter on the 16th.
"The interahamwe [the militia] encircled the whole place and started shooting
and throwing grenades. That was about 8:00 a.m. The women and girls were inside
the church. The men went to confront the attack. We had only stones, spears,
and machetes. That day, almost everyone was killed."
Before the genocide, the region of Kibuye had the largest Tutsi population in
Rwanda. According to African Rights, within 100 days, a population of more than
a quarter million was reduced to fewer than 8,000.
L. T. Daniel, president of the Africa-Indian Ocean Division since the 1995
General Conference Session, was president of the Nigerian Union at the time of
the crisis. He says, of testimonies such as the ones published by African
Rights, "Some of it is true, some is not."
Heraldo Seidl, head of disaster response for ADRA, agrees. "Nobody tells the
truth. People are afraid to. You cannot prove anything in a confused situation
like that."
Nevertheless, according to Daniel, Ntakirutimana has been questioned by church authorities regarding the massacre in the village of Mugunaro. Ntakirutimana's
defense against accusations, Daniel said, was that the killers told him to
leave the area or he would be killed along with the thousands they were
planning to murder. So he left.
The church has not made an official statement concerning Ntakirutimana. "He did
not act officially, if he acted at all," Daniel said. "There was no committee
meeting, as we know of, which he called and [which] passed any action. So the
church cannot defend him officially because there was no official action. . . .
If he acted at all he acted on his own . . . so the church does not have an
official position on him."
Ray Dabrowski, communications director of the General Conference, says, "The
Seventh-day Adventist Church condemns atrocity in any form. We are supportive
of the initiatives of the Rwandan government and the United Nations to bring to
justice those who are responsible for the illegal activities in that country's
crisis."
The church where the massacre occurred has now become a sort of museum. Several
Adventist young people exhumed four bodies from the mass graves and placed them
in coffins in front of the pulpit in the church, "as a reminder that people
came to the church for safety, but met death," Daniel says. The young
Adventists first proposed that bodies should be placed in glass coffins all
around the church. The government supported the plan, but Adventist
administrators objected, saying the building was built and consecrated as a
church. The Adventist officials were overruled by the government and some
members of the congregation. The congregation now worships in a nearby
building. The church is a museum, showing, Daniel says, how deep-rooted the
hurting is.
According to unconfirmed reports, Gerard Ntakirutimana, the son of Elsaphane
Ntakirutimana, accused of participating in the genocide, was said to have found
work in an Adventist hospital in Zambia after leaving the Adventist hospital in
Mugunaro, where the Sabbath slaughter took place. African Rights has gathered
an extensive number of detailed, firsthand testimonies about Gerard
Ntakirutimana.(3) According to Pastor Daniel, Gerard Ntakirutimana is now in
Abidjan, capital of the Ivory Coast and location of the headquarters of the Africa-Indian Ocean Division. Daniel says Gerard Ntakirutimana wants to be
absolved. Currently, he is not receiving pay from the Adventist Church.
Many people want to know how those who profess Christianity, including
Adventists, can take part in such atrocities. "There is such deep-rooted
animosity; deeper than religion," Daniel says. J. J. Nortey, the division
president at th e time of the massacre, supports this view. "Until Christianity
begins to value itself above tribalism and nationalism, then we have a problem.
We are trying to bring people together-Hutu and Tutsi."
"There were many factions in the church already," says Bob Prouty, an Adventist
who helped start the Adventist University of Central Africa, in Mudende. "There
were a lot of bad feelings and problems along regional lines. . . . Corrupt
leadership also contributed to the problem. Administratively, the church was
very weak. . . . Rwanda was isolated and inward-looking, cut off from the
correcting influences of society. The Adventists stuck together for the most
part, but the church was not prepared for such a crisis."
The Adventist Church is one of many church organizations that experienced
serious administrative problems during the 1994 crisis. Many churches expressed
great concern that their members were involved in the killings. "[There is]
absolutely no doubt that significant numbers of prominent Christians in
parishes were involved. . . . Catholics, Anglicans, and Baptists [were]
implicated by omission or commission in militia killings," says Ian Linden,
general secretary of the Catholic Institute for International Relations. As
spokesperson for the Catholic Church, Linden assumes some responsibility for
dealing with the crisis. "The danger is [in assuming] an apologetic role and,
by seeking explanation, inadvertently to excuse."(4)
The Archbishop of Canterbury, George Carey, as leader of the World Anglican
community, sharply criticizes leaders of the Anglican Church in Rwanda. The
church "should have been pointing out some of the atrocities, but by and large
its voice was silent." During a London news conference, following a pastoral
visit to Rwanda, Carey said he was appalled no one had been brought to trial,
and that "the entire church structure in Rwanda may have to be reorganized."(5)
He subsequently dealt personally with individual bishops accused of involvement in the violence.
Nortey has a different answer. "There should be a point where we just say what
is gone is gone. Let's begin afresh."
Echoing his predecessor, Daniel, the current division president, says, "Our
approach is to forget the past and begin afresh. It is not easy to preach to
the deeply aggrieved people in Rwanda after hearing of such atrocities. But we
must forgive those who hurt us. We must forgive anyway."
Adventists around the world wonder if more should not be done, in terms of
public accountability and intense re-examination of Adventism, to reduce the
possibility of Adventists again engaging in genocide, including the slaughter
of other Adventists.
1. Letter from Rakiya Omaar, of Africa Rights, to Roy Branson, March 1, 1996.
SIDEBAR
L. T. Daniel, president of the Africa-Indian Ocean Division, tells the story of
a Seventh-day Adventist pastor's wife.
When the crisis began, a Hutu member of one of the Seventh-day Adventist
churches in Rwanda killed his pastor and thought he had also killed the
pastor's wife. The children ran for their lives. After the killers had left, the couple's 20-year-old son came back to see if the parents were still alive.
He found his father dead. His mother also looked dead, but when he came to lift
her, he could feel that she was still warm. He immediately called for help and
rushed her to the hospital. Suffering from a deep gash in her forehead, for two
weeks the pastor's wife remained in a coma. It took her months to fully
recover.
Finally able to function, the pastor's wife went to the village market. There,
she looked up and found herself eye-to-eye with the fellow Adventist who
thought he had killed her. The man fell down, began rolling on the ground, and
went into convulsions. Since it was in the middle of the marketplace, a crowd
quickly gathered.
The pastor's wife knew that if she showed the scar on her forehead and accused
the man, the crowd would kill him immediately. So, she told everyone, "Please
don't touch him; don't touch him. He saw me, and since he thought I was dead
[she didn't tell a lie!], he couldn't believe it. He must have gone into some
kind of shock."
So the crowd helped the man to his feet, and took him to the woman's house. The
man had torn his clothes, rolling around on the ground, and the pastor's wife
gave him water to bathe himself. After he bathed, she took the shirt of her
20-year-old son, who had rescued her, and gave it to the man.
She told him, "I know you killed my husband and you attempted to kill me. God
saved me. I will not be the one who will turn you in. I will not be the one who
will call people to kill you. I just plead with you to make yourself right with
your God. My husband is gone and it is by the special grace of God that I am
alive. Now go away. I don't want anyone to hear that my husband's killer is in
my house. They will come and kill you, and maybe kill me."
She also told the man, who had stopped going to church, "If I were you, I would
make things right with my God. I have forgiven you for killing my husband. You
had better go and make things right with your God, and begin going to church
again. Where you run to, go to church. Go and fellowship with the brethren."
I have seen this courageous, forgiving woman. The scar is still there. So is her voice, in a Shepherdess singing group. This, too, is Rwanda.
|